14 results for 'cat:"Employment" AND cat:"False Claims" AND cat:"Employment Retaliation"'.
J. Drozd denies, in part, Kaiser Permanente’s motion to dismiss an individual’s False Claims Act case. The individual has sufficiently alleged claims related to tampering with compliance software, and for retaliation.
Court: USDC Eastern District of California, Judge: Drozd, Filed On: February 13, 2024, Case #: 2:19cv559, NOS: False Claims Act - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: false Claims, employment Retaliation
J. Leeson grants in part a company’s motion to dismiss an employee’s complaint that he was fired in retaliation for reporting that the company allowed its officers to access customers’ protected health information while outside of the United States, fraudulently classified its employees as Allentown residents to qualify for a tax credit, and laid off employees in violation of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. The employee failed to state a claim under the False Claims Act.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Leeson, Filed On: November 27, 2023, Case #: 5:23cv2166, NOS: False Claims Act - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: false Claims, Whistleblowers, employment Retaliation
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Nye denies cross-motions to compel regarding an employee relator's allegations of false claims. The False Claims Act does not allow a relator to serve a defendant until the government decides whether it wishes to intervene or to allow the relator to proceed on the government's behalf. The government has moved for dismissal of all claims except the employee's unlawful employment retaliation claim. The employer has not shown that the employee has "possession, custody, or control of any additional medical documents." The employee's "requests are overbroad and would be unduly burdensome to produce."
Court: USDC Idaho, Judge: Nye, Filed On: October 18, 2023, Case #: 4:16cv226, NOS: False Claims Act - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: employment, false Claims, employment Retaliation
J. Lawson grants the hospital's and treasurer's motions to dismiss an action brought by the relator under the False Claims Act and the Georgia False Medicaid Claims Act alleging that the hospital knowingly submitted fraudulent claims to the government for payment and fired the relator when she confronted them. The relator failed to plead facts sufficient to put the hospital on notice of the claims against it and failed to establish a reliable basis for the assertion that the hospital submitted false claims for payment. The relator also failed to adequately allege that the hospital knowingly made any false statement for the purpose of getting a false claim paid by the government.
Court: USDC Middle District of Georgia, Judge: Lawson, Filed On: October 12, 2023, Case #: 7:21cv72, NOS: Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: false Claims, employment Retaliation
J. Cullen grants the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency employees' motion to dismiss. The former county executive director alleged she was fired in retaliation for reporting evidence suggesting that some farmers were submitting fraudulent applications for the forage program, which operates effectively as an insurance program for farmers to cover losses from low crop yields. Despite the availability of USDA administrative hearing and appeal procedures, the former director failed to allege that she pursued these procedures before bringing this
action.
Court: USDC Western District of Virginia, Judge: Cullen , Filed On: October 5, 2023, Case #: 4:22cv13, NOS: False Claims Act - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: false Claims, Whistleblowers, employment Retaliation
J. Wolford allows an employee to continue certain claims contending a company and its executives made false representations about prevailing wage requirements on a city project, and fired the employee for raising objections. The court assumes the company requested payment from the city, which would fall under the false claims act, but evidence did not indicate the request contained material misrepresentations. However, the employee may have been terminated for engaging in protected activity.
Court: USDC Western District of New York, Judge: Wolford , Filed On: September 19, 2023, Case #: 6:20cv6167, NOS: False Claims Act - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: false Claims, employment Retaliation
J. Chuang grants an orthopedic surgery firm its motion to dismiss claims of wage law and False Claims Act violations by a former doctor. The doctor argues the firm violated the Act when it claimed he and another doctor owed overhead expenses and loans exceeding their outstanding accounts receivable, which the doctor claims is false. Then the firm “took control” of the accounts receivable. However, even if the doctor had presented sufficient evidence of false claims, which he failed to do, he is not protected under the Act.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Chuang, Filed On: July 7, 2023, Case #: 8:22cv1501, NOS: False Claims Act - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: employment, false Claims, employment Retaliation